99課綱與108課綱高中國文教科書現代文學選文之研究—以翰林版與龍騰版為例

Abstract

本文探討99課程綱與108課程綱要國文科教科書中現代文學的選文情形，以現行普通高中國文科龍騰版與翰林版教科書為例，分為現代散文、現代小說與現代詩，進行選文的分析與整體比較。第一章為緒論；第二章為現代文學、課程綱要探析；第三章為翰林版教科書現代文學作品編選探析；第四章為龍騰版教科書現代文學作品編選探析；第五章為結論與建議。以下為結論：

一、新、舊課綱教科書編排架構按課綱規範大致相同，例如：題解、作者、課文、注釋與問題討論。就內容而言，課後的問題討論，兩家出版社的新課綱教科書版本皆有重新設計題型以符合素養導向。 二、在新課綱提高現代文學的比例規範下，其中在現代散文的部分，兩家出版社皆有新增許多臺灣作家作品與收錄新的作品選文，題材也較為多元豐富。 三、在現代詩的選文篇數上，新課綱翰林版維持各冊一課兩首詩的編排；新課綱龍騰版收錄現代詩篇數則大幅減少，且皆為男性詩人作品。 四、在現代小說的選文與編排上，兩家出版社在新課綱版本的選文與編排大致沿用舊課綱版本；相較於現代散文，現代小說的收錄篇數較少，且各家有較多重複選文。 五、新課綱版本相較於舊課綱版本，兩家皆有新增未收錄過的作家作品或者收錄同作家的其他篇章；而在相同的A類選文上，可以發現選文標準仍注重作家在文壇的代表性。 六、新課綱的兩家教科書在選文主題與題材上，不同以往較偏重於浪漫唯美的文學選文，新增較多實用取向性質的選文，貼近學生生命經驗；在議題思考上也注重社會關懷與批判，呼應新課綱的精神。

This study investigates the selection of modern literary texts in Chinese language textbooks under the 99 and 108 Curriculum Guidelines, using editions from Hanlin and Lungteng—the two principal publishers for general senior high schools in Taiwan—as case studies. The analysis categorizes the selections into modern prose, modern fiction, and modern poetry, aiming to provide a comparative overview across different genres.Chapter I introduces the research framework. Chapter II presents a theoretical exploration of modern literature and curriculum guidelines. Chapter III analyzes the compilation of modern literature in Hanlin textbooks, while Chapter IV examines the Lungteng edition. Chapter V offers conclusions and pedagogical recommendations. Key findings are summarized as follows:

1.The textbook structure under both the old and new curriculum frameworks adheres broadly to official standards, including elements such as topic introduction, author biography, text content, annotations, and discussion prompts. Under the 108 Curriculum, both publishers redesigned the post-reading activities to reflect competency-based education principles.2.In response to increased requirements for modern literature under the new guidelines, both publishers expanded the modern prose section to include a greater number of works by Taiwanese authors, thereby enriching the thematic diversity.3.In terms of modern poetry, Hanlin maintained a consistent inclusion of two poems per unit across volumes, whereas Lungteng significantly reduced the number of modern poems, with selections exclusively authored by male poets.4.The selection and arrangement of modern fiction texts showed minimal deviation from the previous curriculum. Compared to prose, fewer fiction pieces were included, with noticeable overlap between the two publishers.5.Both publishers incorporated previously unfeatured authors or additional works from established writers in the new editions. For texts categorized under Type A, selection criteria continue to prioritize authorial representativeness in Taiwan's literary landscape. 6.The thematic orientation under the 108 Curriculum exhibits a shift from romantic and aesthetic tendencies toward practical, experience-based narratives that resonate more directly with students’ lived experiences. Furthermore, there is an evident emphasis on fostering social awareness and critical thinking, echoing the core values of the new curriculum.